Consider an "A then B" ordering arising in three ways: a symmetric ordering constraint, an asymmetric ordering constraint, and implicit group ordering. Now, consider that A is stopped (and possibly disabled with target-role=Stopped) and B is unmanaged (both the case where it's started and the case where it's stopped).

In the symmetric and group cases, if B is started, A should be prevented from starting, since B should be stopped (but can't because it's unmanaged) before A is started. Currently, A is not prevented from starting.

In all cases, if B is stopped, A should be allowed to start. This currently works.